domingo, 20 de decembro de 2009

REMATOU O CUME DE COPENHAGUE

OPORTUNIDADE PERDIDA?

Le o que opina a prensa dixital internacional e a ONG Greenpeace. Estes son os titulares, presiona neles para ler a nova completa:






La cumbre de Copenhague
EE UU se declara vencedor

La Casa Blanca elude a la UE y pacta con China e India compromisos voluntarios - La ONU hace suyo el texto y certifica su incapacidad para avanzar por consenso

RAFAEL MÉNDEZ | Copenhague 20/12/2009







A Grudging Accord in Climate Talks

By ANDREW C. REVKIN and JOHN M. BRODER
Published: December 19, 2009








Low targets, goals dropped: Copenhagen ends in failure
Deal thrashed out at talks condemned as climate change scepticism in action








Copenhagen Accord an ‘important beginning’

Priscilla Jebaraj

COPENHAGEN: The official name is the ‘Copenhagen Accord.’ Depending on whom you ask, it’s defined as anything from a “reference document” to the precursor of a “legally binding treaty.”








Climate change accord acknowledged

By Li Xing (chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2009-12-19 23:42

COPENHAGEN: The 15th United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP15, is moving to formally acknowledging a new accord for tackling global warming.
However, the key tasks that the delegates have come to Copenhagen for have not finished yet. Many delegates as well as NGO representatives have expressed disappointment.








Sem consenso em Copenhague, ambientalistas e líderes já falam na COP-16, no México

MAURÍCIO KANNO. Brasil





South Africa

Local opposition, activists slam Copenhagen accord

Dec 20 2009 07:53

South Africa's political opposition and environmentalists described the controversial Copehagen agreement on climate change reached by five powers, including South Africa, in Denmark at the weekend as "not acceptable."







Greenpeace considera perdida en Copenhague la oportunidad histórica para evitar un caos climático.

Juan López de Uralde, director de Greenpeace España, junto con otros dos activistas continúan en Copenhague encarcelados y en situación especial de aislamiento.

19 diciembre 2009

Greenpeace condena hoy enérgicamente la arrogancia de los jefes de Estado de los países más poderosos del mundo por haber presentado un “ultimátum” en la cumbre climática de Copenhague.

domingo, 6 de decembro de 2009

HOXE EMPEZA O CUME DO CLIMA EN COPENHAGUE

Ogallá no ano 2020 os líderes mundiais non teñan que dicir esto:








O que opina a organización ecoloxista Greenpeace:

“En este momento, la voluntad política es lo único que echamos en falta. Las negociaciones para combatir el cambio climático nunca han tenido una oportunidad como ésta, y no debe ser desaprovechada”, ha declarado Juan López de Uralde, Director de Greenpeace España. “Ha llegado el momento de dejar a un lado las palabras y comenzar a actuar”.

Greenpeace hace un llamamiento a todos los presentes en la Cumbre Climática de Copenhague para que se acuerde un tratado legalmente vinculante que incluya:

1. Un recorte de emisiones del 40% para 2020 por parte de los países industrializados (sobre los niveles de 1990)
2. 140 billones de dólares USA anuales por parte de los países industrializados para que los países en desarrollo puedan luchar contra los efectos del cambio climático y detener la deforestación.
3. Detener la deforestación de los bosques tropicales a finales de 2020.
4. Los países empobrecidos deben reducir el crecimiento de sus emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero en un 15-30% para 2020, con el apoyo de los países desarrollados.

Podes ler tamén a Guía rápida para Copenhague no xornal La Vanguardia do 8/12/2009

luns, 30 de novembro de 2009

OUTRA CARTA DE MICHAEL MOORE




An Open Letter to President Obama from Michael Moore

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Dear President Obama,

Do you really want to be the new "war president"? If you go to West Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you are the new war president. Pure and simple. And with that you will do the worst possible thing you could do -- destroy the hopes and dreams so many millions have placed in you. With just one speech tomorrow night you will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your campaign into disillusioned cynics. You will teach them what they've always heard is true -- that all politicians are alike. I simply can't believe you're about to do what they say you are going to do. Please say it isn't so.

It is not your job to do what the generals tell you to do. We are a civilian-run government. WE tell the Joint Chiefs what to do, not the other way around. That's the way General Washington insisted it must be. That's what President Truman told General MacArthur when MacArthur wanted to invade China. "You're fired!," said Truman, and that was that. And you should have fired Gen. McChrystal when he went to the press to preempt you, telling the press what YOU had to do. Let me be blunt: We love our kids in the armed services, but we f*#&in' hate these generals, from Westmoreland in Vietnam to, yes, even Colin Powell for lying to the UN with his made-up drawings of WMD (he has since sought redemption).

So now you feel backed into a corner. 30 years ago this past Thursday (Thanksgiving) the Soviet generals had a cool idea -- "Let's invade Afghanistan!" Well, that turned out to be the final nail in the USSR coffin.

There's a reason they don't call Afghanistan the "Garden State" (though they probably should, seeing how the corrupt President Karzai, whom we back, has his brother in the heroin trade raising poppies). Afghanistan's nickname is the "Graveyard of Empires." If you don't believe it, give the British a call. I'd have you call Genghis Khan but I lost his number. I do have Gorbachev's number though. It's + 41 22 789 1662. I'm sure he could give you an earful about the historic blunder you're about to commit.

With our economic collapse still in full swing and our precious young men and women being sacrificed on the altar of arrogance and greed, the breakdown of this great civilization we call America will head, full throttle, into oblivion if you become the "war president." Empires never think the end is near, until the end is here. Empires think that more evil will force the heathens to toe the line -- and yet it never works. The heathens usually tear them to shreds.

Choose carefully, President Obama. You of all people know that it doesn't have to be this way. You still have a few hours to listen to your heart, and your own clear thinking. You know that nothing good can come from sending more troops halfway around the world to a place neither you nor they understand, to achieve an objective that neither you nor they understand, in a country that does not want us there. You can feel it in your bones.

I know you know that there are LESS than a hundred al-Qaeda left in Afghanistan! A hundred thousand troops trying to crush a hundred guys living in caves? Are you serious? Have you drunk Bush's Kool-Aid? I refuse to believe it.

Your potential decision to expand the war (while saying that you're doing it so you can "end the war") will do more to set your legacy in stone than any of the great things you've said and done in your first year. One more throwing a bone from you to the Republicans and the coalition of the hopeful and the hopeless may be gone -- and this nation will be back in the hands of the haters quicker than you can shout "tea bag!"

Choose carefully, Mr. President. Your corporate backers are going to abandon you as soon as it is clear you are a one-term president and that the nation will be safely back in the hands of the usual idiots who do their bidding. That could be Wednesday morning.

We the people still love you. We the people still have a sliver of hope. But we the people can't take it anymore. We can't take your caving in, over and over, when we elected you by a big, wide margin of millions to get in there and get the job done. What part of "landslide victory" don't you understand?

Don't be deceived into thinking that sending a few more troops into Afghanistan will make a difference, or earn you the respect of the haters. They will not stop until this country is torn asunder and every last dollar is extracted from the poor and soon-to-be poor. You could send a million troops over there and the crazy Right still wouldn't be happy. You would still be the victim of their incessant venom on hate radio and television because no matter what you do, you can't change the one thing about yourself that sends them over the edge.

The haters were not the ones who elected you, and they can't be won over by abandoning the rest of us.

President Obama, it's time to come home. Ask your neighbors in Chicago and the parents of the young men and women doing the fighting and dying if they want more billions and more troops sent to Afghanistan. Do you think they will say, "No, we don't need health care, we don't need jobs, we don't need homes. You go on ahead, Mr. President, and send our wealth and our sons and daughters overseas, 'cause we don't need them, either."

What would Martin Luther King, Jr. do? What would your grandmother do? Not send more poor people to kill other poor people who pose no threat to them, that's what they'd do. Not spend billions and trillions to wage war while American children are sleeping on the streets and standing in bread lines.

All of us that voted and prayed for you and cried the night of your victory have endured an Orwellian hell of eight years of crimes committed in our name: torture, rendition, suspension of the bill of rights, invading nations who had not attacked us, blowing up neighborhoods that Saddam "might" be in (but never was), slaughtering wedding parties in Afghanistan. We watched as hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians were slaughtered and tens of thousands of our brave young men and women were killed, maimed, or endured mental anguish -- the full terror of which we scarcely know.

When we elected you we didn't expect miracles. We didn't even expect much change. But we expected some. We thought you would stop the madness. Stop the killing. Stop the insane idea that men with guns can reorganize a nation that doesn't even function as a nation and never, ever has.

Stop, stop, stop! For the sake of the lives of young Americans and Afghan civilians, stop. For the sake of your presidency, hope, and the future of our nation, stop. For God's sake, stop.

Tonight we still have hope.

Tomorrow, we shall see. The ball is in your court. You DON'T have to do this. You can be a profile in courage. You can be your mother's son.

We're counting on you.

Yours,
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com

P.S. There's still time to have your voice heard. Call the White House at 202-456-1111 or email the President.

mércores, 25 de novembro de 2009

CUME DO CLIMA. COPENHAGUE 7-18 DEC. 2009

No Cume de Copenhague as nacións do mundo poderán tomar decisións vinculantes que contribúan a frear o cambio climático, si non o fan pode que nuns anos esta fotomontaxe da campaña de Greenpeace sexa unha realidade:





Podes ler este artigo do diario El País, 25/11/2009, "Aún hay vida en Copenhague"

sábado, 21 de novembro de 2009

" La lengua inútil"

Nova saída no xornal "El País" do 18/9/2009

Un juez afirma que educar a un hijo en gallego es inútil

Denegado un traslado familiar a Vigo debido a la inmersión lingüística

Para el juez titular del juzgado número 6 de Alcorcón, "no se aprecia que [la lengua gallega] tenga ninguna otra utilidad práctica, más allá del ámbito de aquella comunidad autónoma". Así lo escribe Alejandro José Galán Rodríguez en un auto de un caso de divorcio en el que niega a una madre de Vigo el traslado escolar de sus hijas y en el que, entre otros fundamentos, utiliza el lingüístico. El magistrado afirma que al desarraigo de las niñas contribuye el cambio de "ámbito escolar, pues las menores han estado escolarizadas desde hace muchos años en el Colegio Amanecer de Alcorcón para ahora verse escolarizadas en centros públicos, en Vigo, con inmersión en un sistema escolar en lengua gallega, lengua distinta a la que han sido escolarizadas hasta ahora". Podes continuar lendo a nova aquí.

Nese mesmo diario, ao día seguinte, o escritor e xornalista galego Manuel Rivas escribe o seguinte artigo:

LA LENGUA INÚTIL










Manuel Rivas, A Coruña, 19/11/2009

"Se equivoca usted, señor titular del juzgado número 6 de Alcorcón, al proclamar la carencia de "utilidad pública" del idioma gallego. En una caricatura de Castelao, un campesino dice: "Deus nos libre da Xustiza!". Quizás estaba pensando en usted, señor juez. Fíjese que útiles y previsoras son las lenguas "subalternas".

Fíjese si son previsoras que en los cuentos gallegos de Álvaro Cunqueiro hay personajes que como último deseo piden que en el ataúd, además de la Biblia, le metan el Código Civil por si tienen que pleitear en la otra vida. A la vista de como reculan los tiempos, me adelanto a pedir para el postrer viaje un ejemplar de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, además de la Constitución española (subrayado el artículo 3º, apartado 2) por si el barquero Caronte se pone pesado, dispensando, y me niega la "utilidad pública del gallego" en el Más Allá, siguiendo la doctrina de su señoría.

Ya que estamos con la verdad narrativa de los cuentos y las últimas voluntades, permítame una breve historia. Un anciano campesino manda llamar al notario para hacer el testamento definitivo. Dice: "De la tierra, dejo un tercio para Ramón, un tercio para María, un tercio para Concha, un tercio para Manuel, otro tercio para Andrés..." El notario le interrumpe: "Pero, ¿no serán muchos tercios?" Y el campesino responde: "¡No sabe usted lo grande que es la tierra!" Pues con las lenguas ocurre algo parecido. Que hay sitio para todas. Que no pesan en la cabeza. Que no hay lengua inútil.

Inútiles, inútiles no le somos, señor juez. Hay muchas personas que nos comunicamos normalmente en gallego y no nos consideramos del todo inútiles. Como ocurre incluso en la judicatura, unos somos menos útiles que otros, hacemos lo que podemos, pero respetamos. Eso si, tenemos una educación mínima del respeto. Nuestros padres nos acunaron, nos criaron y nos contaron cuentos en gallego para espantar el miedo. Y no eran unos inútiles, créame. Gracias a ellos, no le tengo miedo, señor juez.

En su Tesis sobre el concepto de la Historia, dice Walter Benjamin: "No hay ningún documento de la civilización que no sea al mismo tiempo un documento de barbarie". Yo antes no entendía muy bien esta frase, se lo juro, pero se me han aclarado de repente las ideas, como por un rayo, después de leer su fundamento "lingüístico" para negar el traslado escolar a Vigo de unas niñas en el auto tramitado en un caso de divorcio. En ese aspecto, el documento no resiste el principio de realidad. En Galicia, las niñas no sólo aprenderían gallego, sino que podrían enriquecer su castellano con las "maravillosas curvas" que Unamuno admiraba en Valle-Inclán.

No voy a hablarle ahora de Alfonso X el Sabio, ni de Rosalía de Castro, ni del tronco común galaico-portugués, patrimonio lingüístico que nos permite comunicarnos con millones de personas en el mundo, desde Brasil al Timor Oriental. Como además tenemos la suerte de compartir el castellano, vea usted, señor juez, que no vamos tan mal pertrechados, siempre, claro, que a los niños no les amputen la lengua "inútil". Creo que lo que procede en este momento es ir al argumento protoecológico enunciado por Julio Camba. Según demostró en un irónico artículo, el gallego es un idioma muy apto para hablar no sólo entre las personas sino también con todo tipo de animales. ¡Fíjese usted si será útil!"

As referencias destes artigos facilitóunolas o noso bo amigo Humberto. Grazas.

domingo, 8 de novembro de 2009

"O DÍA QUE CAMBIOU O MUNDO". 9 DE NOVEMBRO DE 1989

Fai 20 anos, na noite do 9 de novembro tivo lugar un feito histórico que cambiaría o mundo saído da Segunda Guerra Mundial. Non sei se o mundo é agora moito mellor, pero si diferente.

A Comisión Europea colgou este video en you tube:




Outros tamén interesantes son os do xornal El País:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uObOQ54QMQ

ou do programa de televisión documentos TV:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVn-zB1Eca0 (1)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDGh9A-hWg4 (2)



Antes e despois

Henri Cartier-Bresson, 1962





Luís Magán, 1989



Le a testemuña dos protagonistas no xornal El País:





Helmut Kohl, Ex-presidente da RFA




Mihail Gorbachov, Ex-presidente da URSS






Egon Krenz, Ex-presidente da RDA


Podes ler algúns artigos interesantes nestes enlaces:

Joschka Fischer, El País, 9/11/2009


Timothy Garton Ash, The Guardian, 9/11/2009

mércores, 4 de novembro de 2009

TITULAR DO XORNAL "EL PAÍS". 4/11/2009

La cumbre de Barcelona evapora la posibilidad de alcanzar un acuerdo completo en Copenhague.
"Si el clima fuera un banco, ya estaría salvado", denuncian los ecologistas.- El exceso de derechos de emisión en Rusia y los países del Este de Europa amenaza con minar cualquier pacto.


Le a nova completa aquí

El País, 4 de novembro do 2009

venres, 23 de outubro de 2009

Carta de Michael Moore


Congratulations President Obama on the Nobel Peace Prize -Now please earn it!

(Parabéns Presidente Obama polo Premio Nobel da paz, agora por favor gáñao!)

Dear President Obama,

How outstanding that you've been recognized today as a man of peace. Your swift, early pronouncements -- you will close Guantanamo, you will bring the troops home from Iraq, you want a nuclear weapon-free world, you admitted to the Iranians that we overthrew their democratically-elected president in 1953, you made that great speech to the Islamic world in Cairo, you've eliminated that useless term "The War on Terror," you've put an end to torture -- these have all made us and the rest of the world feel a bit more safe considering the disaster of the past eight years. In eight months you have done an about face and taken this country in a much more sane direction.

But...

The irony that you have been awarded this prize on the 2nd day of the ninth year of what is quickly becoming your War in Afghanistan is not lost on anyone. You are truly at a crossroads now. You can listen to the generals and expand the war (only to result in a far-too-predictable defeat) or you can declare Bush's Wars over, and bring all the troops home. Now. That's what a true man of peace would do.

There is nothing wrong with you doing what the last guy failed to do -- capture the man or men responsible for the mass murder of 3,000 people on 9/11. BUT YOU CANNOT DO THAT WITH TANKS AND TROOPS. You are pursuing a criminal, not an army. You do not use a stick of dynamite to get rid of a mouse.

The Taliban is another matter. That is a problem for the people of Afghanistan to resolve -- just as we did in 1776, the French did in 1789, the Cubans did in 1959, the Nicaraguans did in 1979 and the people of East Berlin did in 1989. One thing is certain through all revolutions by people who wish to be free -- they ultimately have to bring about that freedom themselves. Others can be supportive, but freedom can not be delivered from the front seat of someone else's Humvee.

You have to end our involvement in Afghanistan now. If you don't, you'll have no choice but to return the prize to Oslo.

Yours,
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com

P.S. Your opposition has spent the morning attacking you for bringing such good will to this country. Why do they hate America so much? I get the feeling that if you found the cure for cancer this afternoon they'd be denouncing you for destroying free enterprise because cancer centers would have to close. There are those who say you've done nothing yet to deserve this award. As far as I'm concerned, the very fact that you've offered to walk into the minefield of hate and try to undo the irreparable damage the last president did is not only appreciated by me and millions of others, it is also an act of true bravery. That's why you got the prize. The whole world is depending on the U.S. -- and you -- to literally save this planet. Let's not let them down.


luns, 19 de outubro de 2009

Por que Blog de Xeografía crítica?

Porque nos inflúe a maneira de pensar dos xeógrafos radicais. Estas persoas nos anos sesenta do s. XX, apoiándose nas ideas dos filósofos da chamada Escola de Frankfurt (Adorno, Marcuse, Walter Benjamin...) que reformularon as teorías marxistas, criticaron o cientifismo e positivismo imperante en tódalas ciencias (físicas e humanísticas), consecuencia do desenvolvemento económico espectacular posterior á segunda guerra mundial e da euforia científica que levou á humanidade a grandes logros técnicos como a chegada á Lúa pero que non resolvía os problemas máis prioritarios como a fame no mundo.

Eles reivindicaban una Xeografía para a acción, que non só persiga coñecer o mundo senón tamén melloralo.

Modestamente o afirmamos, pero esta tamén é a idea que nos move a nós.

Por que lle chamamos "O Umia" a este blog?


Porque quere ser unha pequena homenaxe ao noso poeta cambadés, Ramón Cabanillas, do que este ano 2009 estamos conmemorando o 50 aniversario da morte. Cabanillas e uns amigos lanzaron á rúa en 1907 (fixo en xaneiro 102 anos), unha publicación que se chamaba:

"EL UMIA. Periódico independiente. Se publica los días 5 y 21 de cada mes."

Querían os autores contribuír á mellora do seu pobo e así o afirman no artigo do primeiro número: "Nuestros propósitos":

"Nuestros amores son nuestro pueblo: por su prosperidad, por su engrandecimiento nos creemos obligados a todos los sacrificios, a que se nos moteje de chiflados, ese chabacano epíteto con que se pretende herir a los modernos quijotes; y por eso, aún conociendo nuestra insuficiencia, echamos a la calle este periódico en el que recogeremos la opinión de nuestros vecinos, y, hasta donde lleguen nuestras fuerzas lucharemos sin escudo, adarga, ni coselete, a pecho descubierto, alta la frente, contra la atonía de unos, el pesimismo de los más y las fantásticas visiones nunca realizadas, de otros, acaso los menos, pero no menos perniciosos."

E remata o artigo:

"Con un tropo, no por gastado menos expresivo, refundiremos, pues, nuestro propósito: Todo por y para Cambados"


Pero non durou moito a experiencia, seguramente por motivos económicos e tamén políticos (os caciques locais non estaban para críticas), o derradeiro número de O Umia sae o 21 de maio de 1907. Apenas durou uns meses a aventura e así escribe desencantado Cabanillas neste último exemplar:

"¿Para que vivir? Las ocho octavas partes de nuestros lectores de la localidad, por una u otras causas desean nuestra muerte (...) No hemos visto realizada ni la más trivial de las peticiones de interés general que hemos formulado. Es más, hemos llegado a oir que bastaba que se tratase o pidiese por nosotros, para que no se hiciese".


Esperamos correr nós mellor sorte.